PTF11iqb: Cool supergiant mass loss that bridges the gap between Type IIn and normal supernovae
Nathan Smith, Jon C. Mauerhan, S. Bradley Cenko, Mansi M. Kasliwal,, Jeffrey M. Silverman, Alexei V. Filippenko, Avishay Gal-Yam, Kelsey I. Clubb,, Melissa L. Graham, Douglas C. Leonard, J. Chuck Horst, G. Grant Williams,, Jennifer E. Andrews, Shrinivas R. Kulkarni, Peter Nugent

TL;DR
PTF11iqb demonstrates that supernovae with weak circumstellar interaction can exhibit features of both Type IIn and normal supernovae, revealing a continuum in supernova progenitor mass loss behaviors.
Contribution
This study presents detailed observations of PTF11iqb, showing it bridges the gap between Type IIn and normal supernovae, and challenges the assumption that early WR features indicate a WR progenitor.
Findings
Spectroscopic evolution resembles SN 1998S but with weaker early CSM interaction.
Light curve modeled with weak CSM interaction on a Type II-P supernova.
Progenitor was a cool supergiant with an extended H envelope, not a WR star.
Abstract
PTF11iqb was initially classified as a TypeIIn event caught very early after explosion. It showed narrow Wolf-Rayet (WR) spectral features on day 2, but the narrow emission weakened quickly and the spectrum morphed to resemble those of Types II-L and II-P. At late times, Halpha emission exhibited a complex, multipeaked profile reminiscent of SN1998S. In terms of spectroscopic evolution, we find that PTF11iqb was a near twin of SN~1998S, although with weaker interaction with circumstellar material (CSM) at early times, and stronger CSM interaction at late times. We interpret the spectral changes as caused by early interaction with asymmetric CSM that is quickly (by day 20) enveloped by the expanding SN ejecta photosphere, but then revealed again after the end of the plateau when the photosphere recedes. The light curve can be matched with a simple model for weak CSM interaction added to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
