The fate of supernova remnants near quiescent supermassive black holes
Alex Rimoldi, Elena M. Rossi, Tsvi Piran, Simon Portegies Zwart

TL;DR
This paper develops a numerical method to study supernova remnant evolution near quiescent supermassive black holes, revealing how SMBH mass influences SNR shapes, lifetimes, and disruption, with implications for observations in galactic nuclei.
Contribution
A novel numerical approach based on the Kompaneets approximation to model SNR evolution in SMBH environments, accounting for gas gradients and tidal effects.
Findings
SNR disruption occurs faster around SMBHs >10^7 Msun, shortening the X-ray phase.
In the Galactic Centre, SNRs have longer X-ray emitting phases, consistent with observations.
Estimated supernova rate in Sgr A*'s sphere of influence is about one per 10^4 years.
Abstract
There is mounting observational evidence that most galactic nuclei host both supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and young populations of stars. With an abundance of massive stars, core-collapse supernovae are expected in SMBH spheres of influence. We develop a novel numerical method, based on the Kompaneets approximation, to trace supernova remnant (SNR) evolution in these hostile environments, where radial gas gradients and SMBH tides are present. We trace the adiabatic evolution of the SNR shock until 50% of the remnant is either in the radiative phase or is slowed down below the SMBH Keplerian velocity and is sheared apart. In this way, we obtain shapes and lifetimes of SNRs as a function of the explosion distance from the SMBH, the gas density profile and the SMBH mass. As an application, we focus here exclusively on quiescent SMBHs, because their light may not hamper detections of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
