The Biases of Optical Line-Ratio Selection for Active Galactic Nuclei, and the Intrinsic Relationship between Black Hole Accretion and Galaxy Star Formation
Jonathan R. Trump (1,2), Mouyuan Sun (1), Gregory R. Zeimann (1),, Cuyler Luck (3), Joanna S. Bridge (1), Catherine J. Grier (1), Alex Hagen, (1), Stephanie Juneau (4), Antonio Montero-Dorta (5), David J. Rosario (6),, W. Niel Brandt (1), Robin Ciardullo (1)

TL;DR
This study investigates biases in optical line-ratio selection of AGNs, revealing that star formation dilution affects detection in low-mass galaxies and suggesting that AGN activity correlates with star formation rather than quenching it.
Contribution
The paper introduces a physically-motivated simulation approach to correct for observational biases in AGN detection and explores the intrinsic relationship between black hole accretion and galaxy star formation.
Findings
Bias against AGN detection in low-mass, star-forming galaxies due to star formation dilution.
AGN accretion correlates with specific star formation rate in massive galaxies.
AGN feedback is likely not the primary driver of star formation quenching.
Abstract
We use 317,000 emission-line galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to investigate line-ratio selection of active galactic nuclei (AGNs). In particular, we demonstrate that "star formation dilution" by HII regions causes a significant bias against AGN selection in low-mass, blue, star-forming, disk-dominated galaxies. This bias is responsible for the observed preference of AGNs among high-mass, green, moderately star-forming, bulge-dominated hosts. We account for the bias and simulate the intrinsic population of emission-line AGNs using a physically-motivated Eddington ratio distribution, intrinsic AGN narrow line region line ratios, a luminosity-dependent Lbol/L[OIII] bolometric correction, and the observed Mbh-sigma relation. These simulations indicate that, in massive (log(M*/Msun) > 10) galaxies, AGN accretion is correlated with specific star formation rate but is otherwise…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
