Gracefully Degrading Consensus and $k$-Set Agreement in Directed Dynamic Networks

TL;DR

This paper investigates the limits of achieving consensus and $k$-set agreement in directed dynamic networks with message adversaries, introducing new conditions and algorithms that adapt to network stability and information flow.

Contribution

It introduces vertex-stable root components (VSRCs) as a means to enable consensus and $k$-set agreement under certain dynamic network conditions, and presents algorithms that degrade gracefully based on network strength.

Findings

Consensus impossible under weak connectivity guarantees.

A consensus algorithm works under VSRC(1, 4H + 2).

Gracefully degrading $k$-set agreement is feasible with the proposed algorithms.

Abstract

We study distributed agreement in synchronous directed dynamic networks, where an omniscient message adversary controls the availability of communication links. We prove that consensus is impossible under a message adversary that guarantees weak connectivity only, and introduce vertex-stable root components (VSRCs) as a means for circumventing this impossibility: A VSRC(k, d) message adversary guarantees that, eventually, there is an interval of $d$ consecutive rounds where every communication graph contains at most $k$ strongly (dynamic) connected components consisting of the same processes, which have at most outgoing links to the remaining processes. We present a consensus algorithm that works correctly under a VSRC(1, 4H + 2) message adversary, where $H$ is the dynamic causal network diameter. On the other hand, we show that consensus is impossible against a VSRC(1, H - 1) or a VSRC(2, $\infty$) message adversary, revealing that there is not much hope to deal with stronger message adversaries. However, we show that gracefully degrading consensus, which degrades to general $k$-set agreement in case of unfavourable network conditions, is feasible against stronger message adversaries: We provide a $k$-uniform $k$-set agreement algorithm, where the number of system-wide decision values $k$ is not encoded in the algorithm, but rather determined by the actual power of the message adversary in a run: Our algorithm guarantees at most $k$ decision values under a VSRC(n, d) + MAJINF(k) message adversary, which combines VSRC(n, d) (for some small $d$, ensuring termination) with some information flow guarantee MAJINF(k) between certain VSRCs (ensuring $k$-agreement). Our results provide a significant step towards the exact solvability/impossibility border of general $k$-set agreement in directed dynamic networks.