True Masses of Radial-Velocity Exoplanets
Robert A. Brown

TL;DR
This paper assesses the potential of space telescopes with different technologies to accurately measure the true masses of known radial-velocity exoplanets, considering observational constraints and mission design.
Contribution
It compares the science capabilities of star-shade and coronagraph-based space telescopes for exoplanet mass measurements, highlighting the advantages of star-shades.
Findings
Star-shade missions outperform coronagraphs by about three times in science power.
EXO-C can observe 10 of 16 RV planets with 90% success guarantee.
WFIRST-C can observe 12 of 16 RV planets with 90% success guarantee.
Abstract
We explore the science power of space telescopes used to estimate the true masses of known radial-velocity exoplanets by means of astrometry on direct images. We translate a desired mass accuracy (+/10% in our example) into a minimum goal for the signal-to-noise ratio, which implies a minimum exposure time. When the planet is near a node, the mass measurement becomes difficult if not impossible, because the apparent separation becomes decoupled from the inclination angle of the orbit. The combination of this nodal effect with considerations of solar and anti-solar pointing restrictions, photometric and obscurational completeness, and image blurring due to orbital motion, severely limits the observing opportunities, often to only brief intervals in a five-year mission. We compare the science power of four missions, two with external star shades, EXO-S and WFIRST-S, and two with internal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
