Assessing the true role of coauthors in the h-index measure of an author scientific impact
Marcel Ausloos

TL;DR
This paper introduces a PCA-based method to better quantify the influence of co-authors on an author's h-index, revealing that co-authors can significantly impact perceived scientific impact.
Contribution
It proposes a novel PCA-based approach to assess co-authors' roles, providing a more accurate measure of individual contributions to scientific impact.
Findings
Co-authors' influence can be underestimated by traditional h-index.
The PCA method effectively estimates co-authors' contribution weights.
Application to real data demonstrates the method's practicality.
Abstract
A method based on the classical principal component analysis leads to demonstrate that the role of co-authors should give a h-index measure to a group leader higher than usually accepted. The method rather easily gives what is usually searched for, i.e. an estimate of the role (or "weight") of co-authors, as the additional value to an author papers' popularity. The construction of the co-authorship popularity H-matrix is exemplified and the role of eigenvalues and the main eigenvector component are discussed. An example illustrates the points and serves as the basis for suggesting a generally practical application of the concept.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
