Finite-size effects in the quasi-one-dimensional quantum magnets Sr$_{2}$CuO$_{3}$, Sr$_{2}$Cu$_{0.99}$M$_{0.01}$O$_{3}$ (M = Ni, Zn), and SrCuO$_{2}$
Koushik Karmakar, Surjeet Singh

TL;DR
This study investigates how finite-size effects and doping influence the magnetic properties of quasi-one-dimensional spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnets, revealing defect behaviors and the impact on magnetic ordering.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of defect effects and finite-size influences on magnetic susceptibility in specific quasi-1D antiferromagnetic compounds, including doped and frustrated systems.
Findings
Ni acts as a scalar defect with screened spin in Sr$_{2}$Cu$_{0.99}$NiO$_{3}$
Doping reduces defect concentration compared to nominal values in Sr$_{2}$Cu$_{0.99}$ZnO$_{3}$
Doping influences low-temperature magnetic order and frustration effects in SrCuO$_{2}$
Abstract
We studied the finite-size effects on the magnetic behavior of the quasi-one-dimensional spin S = Heisenberg antiferromagnets SrCuO, SrCuMO (M = Zn and Ni), and SrCuO. Magnetic susceptibility data were analyzed to estimate the concentration of chain-breaks due to extrinsically doped defects and/or due to slight oxygen off-stoichiometry. We show that the susceptibility of SrCuNiO can be described by considering Ni as a scalar defect () indicating that the Ni spin is screened. In SrCuZnO susceptibility analysis yields a defect concentration smaller than the nominal value which is in good qualitative agreement with crystal growth experiments. Influence of doping on the low-temperature long-range spin ordered state is studied. In the compound…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
