Gibbs posterior inference on the minimum clinically important difference
Nick Syring, Ryan Martin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a model-free Gibbs posterior approach for estimating the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), providing valid and efficient interval estimates even with small samples, addressing challenges of bias and inefficiency in traditional models.
Contribution
It develops a novel Gibbs posterior method for MCID inference that avoids parametric assumptions, balancing robustness and efficiency.
Findings
The Gibbs posterior converges at an optimal rate.
Interval estimates are valid and efficient for small samples.
The method outperforms traditional parametric and nonparametric approaches.
Abstract
IIt is known that a statistically significant treatment may not be clinically significant. A quantity that can be used to assess clinical significance is called the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), and inference on the MCID is an important and challenging problem. Modeling for the purpose of inference on the MCID is non-trivial, and concerns about bias from a misspecified parametric model or inefficiency from a nonparametric model motivate an alternative approach to balance robustness and efficiency. In particular, a recently proposed representation of the MCID as the minimizer of a suitable risk function makes it possible to construct a Gibbs posterior distribution for the MCID without specifying a model. We establish the posterior convergence rate and show, numerically, that an appropriately scaled version of this Gibbs posterior yields interval estimates for the MCID…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
