Measurement of the 187Re({\alpha},n)190Ir reaction cross section at sub-Coulomb energies using the Cologne Clover Counting Setup
P. Scholz, A. Endres, A. Hennig, L. Netterdon, H.W. Becker, J. Endres,, J. Mayer, U. Giesen, D. Rogalla, F. Schl\"uter, S.G. Pickstone, K.O. Zell,, and A. Zilges

TL;DR
This study measures the 187Re({},n)190Ir reaction cross section at sub-Coulomb energies to improve models of alpha+nucleus interactions relevant for astrophysical nucleosynthesis, revealing the superiority of the Sauerwein-Rauscher potential.
Contribution
It provides new experimental cross section data at low energies and validates a modified optical-model potential for better theoretical predictions.
Findings
Experimental cross sections were measured at five energies.
The Sauerwein-Rauscher potential accurately reproduces the data.
The energy dependence of the imaginary part decreases exponentially.
Abstract
Uncertainties in adopted models of particle+nucleus optical-model potentials directly influence the accuracy in the theoretical predictions of reaction rates as they are needed for reaction-network calculations in, for instance, {\gamma}-process nucleosynthesis. The improvement of the {\alpha}+nucleus optical-model potential is hampered by the lack of experimental data at astrophysically relevant energies especially for heavier nuclei. Measuring the Re187({\alpha},n)Ir190 reaction cross section at sub-Coulomb energies extends the scarce experimental data available in this mass region and helps understanding the energy dependence of the imaginary part of the {\alpha}+nucleus optical-model potential at low energies. Applying the activation method, after the irradiation of natural rhenium targets with {\alpha}-particle energies of 12.4 to 14.1 MeV, the reaction yield and thus the reaction…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
