Testing protostellar disk formation models with ALMA observations
Daniel Harsono, Ewine van Dishoeck, Simon Bruderer, Zhi-Yun Li, Jes, Jorgensen

TL;DR
This study compares different models of protostellar disk formation using ALMA observations, highlighting the observational signatures that distinguish between disks and envelopes and emphasizing the need for high-resolution, multi-line data.
Contribution
It presents a detailed analysis of how to differentiate rotationally supported disks from infalling envelopes using synthetic observations from models and simulations.
Findings
High spatial resolution (~14 AU) is needed to distinguish disk types.
Pseudo-disks show flatter velocity profiles than RSDs.
Turbulence levels influence line widths and disk detection.
Abstract
Abridged: Recent simulations have explored different ways to form accretion disks around low-mass stars. We aim to present observables to differentiate a rotationally supported disk from an infalling rotating envelope toward deeply embedded young stellar objects and infer their masses and sizes. Two 3D magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) formation simulations and 2D semi-analytical model are studied. The dust temperature structure is determined through continuum radiative transfer RADMC3D modelling. A simple temperature dependent CO abundance structure is adopted and synthetic spectrally resolved submm rotational molecular lines up to are simulated. All models predict similar compact components in continuum if observed at the spatial resolutions of 0.5-1 (70-140 AU) typical of the observations to date. A spatial resolution of 14 AU and high dynamic range () are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
