Linear prediction of atmospheric wave-fronts for tomographic Adaptive Optics systems: modelling and robustness assessment
Kate Jackson, Carlos Correia, Olivier Lardiere, Dave Andersen, and Colin Bradley

TL;DR
This paper analytically evaluates the accuracy and robustness of various linear prediction models for atmospheric wave-fronts in tomographic Adaptive Optics, focusing on their tolerance to model errors and turbulence conditions.
Contribution
It extends previous work by analyzing the robustness of linear prediction algorithms under realistic model errors and turbulence conditions.
Findings
+/- 100% wind-speed error is tolerable
+/- 50 degrees error is tolerable
Best predictor outperforms no-prediction within these error bounds
Abstract
We use a theoretical frame-work to analytically assess temporal prediction error functions on von-Karman turbulence when a zonal representation of wave-fronts is assumed. Linear prediction models analysed include auto-regressive of order up to three, bilinear interpolation functions and a minimum mean square error predictor. This is an extension of the authors' previously published work (see ref. 2) in which the efficacy of various temporal prediction models was established. Here we examine the tolerance of these algorithms to specific forms of model errors, thus defining the expected change in behaviour of the previous results under less ideal conditions. Results show that +/- 100pc wind-speed error and +/- 50 deg are tolerable before the best linear predictor delivers poorer performance than the no-prediction case.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
