Experimental Research Data Quality In Materials Science
Thorsten Wuest, Rainer Tinscher, Robert Porzel, Klaus-Dieter Thoben

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges and proposes a systematic methodology for measuring and assuring the quality of experimental research data in materials science to enhance data accessibility and dissemination.
Contribution
It introduces a combined approach of methods for systematically assessing and ensuring the quality of materials science experimental data before publication.
Findings
Identified key requirements and challenges for data quality measurement.
Critically assessed various methods for data quality evaluation.
Presented a practical, combined approach for data quality assurance.
Abstract
In materials sciences, a large amount of research data is generated through a broad spectrum of different experiments. As of today, experimental research data including meta-data in materials science is often stored decentralized by the researcher(s) conducting the experiments without generally accepted standards on what and how to store data. The conducted research and experiments often involve a considerable investment from public funding agencies that desire the results to be made available in order to increase their impact. In order to achieve the goal of citable and (openly) accessible materials science experimental research data in the future, not only an adequate infrastructure needs to be established but the question of how to measure the quality of the experimental research data also to be addressed. In this publication, the authors identify requirements and challenges towards…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
