Validation of Twelve Small Kepler Transiting Planets in the Habitable Zone
Guillermo Torres, David M. Kipping, Francois Fressin, Douglas A., Caldwell, Joseph D. Twicken, Sarah Ballard, Natalie M. Batalha, Stephen T., Bryson, David R. Ciardi, Christopher E. Henze, Steve B. Howell, Howard T., Isaacson, Jon M. Jenkins, Philip S. Muirhead

TL;DR
This study statistically validates twelve small Kepler transiting planets in the habitable zone, confirming their planetary nature and potential for rocky composition, thereby doubling the number of known rocky habitable zone planets.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive validation method combining BLENDER analysis with follow-up observations to confirm small habitable zone planets without mass measurements.
Findings
All twelve planets are in the habitable zone.
Nine of the planets are likely rocky.
Two planets are most similar to Earth in size and flux.
Abstract
We present an investigation of twelve candidate transiting planets from Kepler with orbital periods ranging from 34 to 207 days, selected from initial indications that they are small and potentially in the habitable zone (HZ) of their parent stars. Few of these objects are known. The expected Doppler signals are too small to confirm them by demonstrating that their masses are in the planetary regime. Here we verify their planetary nature by validating them statistically using the BLENDER technique, which simulates large numbers of false positives and compares the resulting light curves with the Kepler photometry. This analysis was supplemented with new follow-up observations (high-resolution optical and near-infrared spectroscopy, adaptive optics imaging, and speckle interferometry), as well as an analysis of the flux centroids. For eleven of them (KOI-0571.05, 1422.04, 1422.05,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
