A Turnover in the Galaxy Main Sequence of Star Formation at $M_{*} \sim 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ for Redshifts $z < 1.3$
Nicholas Lee, D. B. Sanders, Caitlin M. Casey, Sune Toft, N. Z., Scoville, Chao-Ling Hung, Emeric Le Floc'h, Olivier Ilbert, H. Jabran Zahid,, Herve Aussel, Peter Capak, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Lisa J. Kewley, Yanxia Li,, Kevin Schawinski, Kartik Sheth, Quanbao Xiao

TL;DR
This study re-examines the galaxy star formation main sequence up to redshift 1.3, revealing a consistent turnover at stellar mass around 10^10 solar masses and providing a new parameterization of the relationship.
Contribution
It introduces a new parameterization of the star formation main sequence that captures the turnover at 10^10 solar masses across redshifts up to 1.3.
Findings
Turnover in the main sequence at M* ~ 10^10 M_sun at all redshifts.
SFR scales as (1+z)^4.12, indicating strong evolution with redshift.
Galaxies above the turnover mass have significantly lower sSFR than extrapolated from lower masses.
Abstract
The relationship between galaxy star formation rates (SFR) and stellar masses () is re-examined using a mass-selected sample of 62,000 star-forming galaxies at in the COSMOS 2-deg field. Using new far-infrared photometry from -PACS and SPIRE and -MIPS 24 m, along with derived infrared luminosities from the NRK method based on galaxies' locations in the restframe color-color diagram vs. , we are able to more accurately determine total SFRs for our complete sample. At all redshifts, the relationship between median and follows a power-law at low stellar masses, and flattens to nearly constant SFR at high stellar masses. We describe a new parameterization that provides the best fit to the main sequence and characterizes the low mass power-law slope, turnover mass, and overall scaling. The turnover in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
