A delayed choice quantum eraser explained by the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics

TL;DR

This paper explains the delayed choice quantum eraser using the transactional interpretation, offering a more intuitive understanding of wave function collapse and clarifying that it does not imply retro-causal signaling.

Contribution

It demonstrates how the transactional interpretation provides a simpler, more intuitive explanation of the quantum eraser experiment compared to the Copenhagen interpretation.

Findings

Transactional interpretation offers a clearer view of wave function collapse.

No retro-causal signaling occurs in the quantum eraser.

Both interpretations yield identical experimental results.

Abstract

This paper explains the delayed choice quantum eraser of Kim et al. in terms of the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics by John Cramer. It is kept deliberately mathematically simple to help explain the transactional technique. The emphasis is on a clear understanding of how the instantaneous "collapse" of the wave function due to a measurement at a specific time and place may be reinterpreted as a gradual collapse over the entire path of the photon and over the entire transit time from slit to detector. This is made possible by the use of a retarded offer wave, which is thought to travel from the slits (or rather the small region within the parametric crystal where down-conversion takes place) to the detector and an advanced counter wave traveling backward in time from the detector to the slits. The point here is to make clear how simple the Cramer transactional picture is and how much more intuitive the collapse of the wave function becomes if viewed in this way. Also any confusion about possible retro-causal signaling is put to rest. A delayed choice quantum eraser does not require any sort of backward in time communication. This paper makes the point that it is preferable to use the Transactional Interpretation (TI) over the usual Copenhagen Interpretation (CI) for a more intuitive understanding of the quantum eraser delayed choice experiment. Both methods give exactly the same end results and can be used interchangeably.