Heavily reddened type 1 quasars at z > 2 I: Evidence for significant obscured black-hole growth at the highest quasar luminosities
Manda Banerji, S. Alaghband-Zadeh, Paul C. Hewett, Richard G. McMahon

TL;DR
This study identifies a new population of highly luminous, dust-reddened Type 1 quasars at z>2, revealing significant obscured black-hole growth at the highest quasar luminosities and suggesting a luminosity-dependent obscuration phase.
Contribution
It presents the discovery and characterization of a large sample of hyperluminous, dust-reddened quasars at high redshift, highlighting their properties and implications for quasar evolution.
Findings
Reddened quasars have similar Hα equivalent widths to unobscured quasars.
The luminosity function of reddened quasars is flatter and exceeds unobscured quasars at the brightest magnitudes.
The properties of these quasars suggest they are in a brief evolutionary phase of galaxy formation.
Abstract
We present a new population of z>2 dust-reddened, Type 1 quasars with 0.5<E(B-V)<1.5, selected using near infra-red (NIR) imaging data from the UKIDSS-LAS, ESO-VHS and WISE surveys. NIR spectra obtained using the Very Large Telescope (VLT) for 24 new objects bring our total sample of spectroscopically confirmed hyperluminous (>10^{13}L_0), high-redshift dusty quasars to 38. There is no evidence for reddened quasars having significantly different H equivalent widths relative to unobscured quasars. The average black-hole masses (~10^9-10^10 M_0) and bolometric luminosities (~10^{47} erg/s) are comparable to the most luminous unobscured quasars at the same redshift, but with a tail extending to very high luminosities of ~10^{48} erg/s. Sixty-six per cent of the reddened quasars are detected at at 22um by WISE. The average 6um rest-frame luminosity is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
