All about baryons: revisiting SIDM predictions at small halo masses
A. Bastidas Fry (UW), F.Governato (UW), A.Pontzen (UCL), T.Quinn (UW),, M.Tremmel (UW), L.Anderson (UW), H.Menon (UIUC), A.M.Brooks (Rutgers) and, J.Wadsley (McMaster)

TL;DR
This study compares dwarf galaxy formation in CDM and SIDM models using hydrodynamic simulations, finding that SIDM with a constant cross section has limited effects on low-mass halos, and suggesting velocity-dependent cross sections for better differentiation.
Contribution
First simulations combining SIDM with stellar feedback in dwarf galaxies, showing limited impact of SIDM at low masses and proposing velocity-dependent cross sections for future models.
Findings
SIDM with constant cross section has minimal impact on halos with Vmax < 30 km/s.
Baryonic processes create similar dark matter cores in both CDM and SIDM at higher masses.
Current SIDM models with constant cross section cannot easily distinguish from CDM at low masses.
Abstract
We use cosmological hydrodynamic simulations to consistently compare the assembly of dwarf galaxies in both dominated, Cold (CDM) and Self--Interacting (SIDM) dark matter models. The SIDM model adopts a constant cross section of 2 , a relatively large value to maximize its effects. These are the first SIDM simulations that are combined with a description of stellar feedback that naturally drives potential fluctuations able to create dark matter cores. Remarkably, SIDM fails to significantly lower the central dark matter density at halo peak velocities V 30 Km/s. This is due to the fact that the central regions of very low--mass field halos have relatively low central velocity dispersion and densities, leading to time scales for SIDM collisions greater than a Hubble time. CDM halos with V 30 km/s have inefficient star formation, and hence weak…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
