Scattering Suppression from Arbitrary Objects in Spatially-Dispersive Layered Metamaterials
Alexander S. Shalin, Pavel Ginzburg, Alexey A. Orlov, Ivan Iorsh,, Pavel A. Belov, Yuri S. Kivshar, and Anatoly V. Zayats

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a numerical method for nearly perfect scattering suppression from arbitrary objects using layered metamaterials, overcoming typical losses and dispersion issues, with potential applications in cloaking and sensing.
Contribution
It introduces a layered metamaterial design that suppresses scattering from arbitrary objects in all directions, even with spatial dispersion effects, advancing cloaking technology.
Findings
Achieved less than 10% intensity change in scattering suppression
Demonstrated suppression in both forward and backward directions
Proposed a simple realization for scattering-free detectors
Abstract
Concealing objects by making them invisible to an external electromagnetic probe is coined by the term cloaking. Cloaking devices, having numerous potential applications, are still face challenges in realization, especially in the visible spectral range. In particular, inherent losses and extreme parameters of metamaterials required for the cloak implementation are the limiting factors. Here, we numerically demonstrate nearly perfect suppression of scattering from arbitrary shaped objects in spatially dispersive metamaterial acting as an alignment-free concealing cover. We consider a realization of a metamaterial as a metal-dielectric multilayer and demonstrate suppression of scattering from an arbitrary object in forward and backward directions with perfectly preserved wavefronts and less than 10% absolute intensity change, despite spatial dispersion effects present in the composite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
