Combining Spectroscopic and Photometric Surveys: Same or different sky?
Martin Eriksen, Enrique Gaztanaga

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that overlapping spectroscopic and photometric surveys significantly improve dark energy measurements by leveraging additional observables and sample variance cancellation, challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive forecast for two stage-IV surveys, highlighting the benefits of survey overlap through a new covariance accounting approach.
Findings
Overlapping surveys enhance dark energy constraints.
Sample variance cancellation is a key benefit.
Optimal constraints involve specific parameter correlation strategies.
Abstract
This article looks at the combined constraints from a photometric and spectroscopic survey. These surveys will measure cosmology using weak lensing (WL), galaxy clustering, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and redshift space distortions (RSD). We find, contrary to some findings in the recent literature, that overlapping surveys can give important benefits when measuring dark energy. We therefore try to clarify the status of this issue with a full forecast of two stage-IV surveys using a new approach to properly account for covariance between the different probes in the overlapping samples. The benefit of the overlapping survey can be traced back to two factors: additional observables and sample variance cancellation. Both needs to be taken into account and contribute equally when combining 3D power spectrum and 2D correlations for lensing. With an analytic example we also illustrate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena · demographic modeling and climate adaptation
