Fast, simple and accurate handwritten digit classification by training shallow neural network classifiers with the 'extreme learning machine' algorithm
Mark D. McDonnell, Migel D. Tissera, Tony Vladusich, Andr\'e van, Schaik, and Jonathan Tapson

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that shallow neural networks trained with the Extreme Learning Machine algorithm can achieve near state-of-the-art accuracy on handwritten digit and image recognition benchmarks with rapid training times, challenging the dominance of deep architectures.
Contribution
The authors introduce enhancements to the ELM algorithm, including random receptive field sampling and combined backpropagation, enabling high accuracy with shallow networks on image classification tasks.
Findings
Error rates below 1% on MNIST with shallow networks
Achieved less than 5.5% error on NORB dataset
Rapid training time (~10 minutes) for high accuracy
Abstract
Recent advances in training deep (multi-layer) architectures have inspired a renaissance in neural network use. For example, deep convolutional networks are becoming the default option for difficult tasks on large datasets, such as image and speech recognition. However, here we show that error rates below 1% on the MNIST handwritten digit benchmark can be replicated with shallow non-convolutional neural networks. This is achieved by training such networks using the 'Extreme Learning Machine' (ELM) approach, which also enables a very rapid training time (~10 minutes). Adding distortions, as is common practise for MNIST, reduces error rates even further. Our methods are also shown to be capable of achieving less than 5.5% error rates on the NORB image database. To achieve these results, we introduce several enhancements to the standard ELM algorithm, which individually and in combination…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
