nIFTy Cosmology: Galaxy/halo mock catalogue comparison project on clustering statistics
Chia-Hsun Chuang, Cheng Zhao, Francisco Prada, Emiliano Munari,, Santiago Avila, Albert Izard, Francisco-Shu Kitaura, Marc Manera, Pierluigi, Monaco, Steven Murray, Alexander Knebe, Claudia G. Scoccola, Gustavo Yepes,, Juan Garcia-Bellido, Felipe A. Marin, Volker Muller

TL;DR
This paper compares various fast methods for generating mock galaxy and halo catalogues, showing that approximate solvers can achieve high accuracy in clustering statistics after calibration, aiding large-scale structure analysis.
Contribution
It evaluates the accuracy of different mock catalogue generation methods against N-body simulations for clustering statistics, highlighting the effectiveness of perturbation theory and semi-N-body approaches.
Findings
Perturbation-based models match N-body results well for most clustering statistics.
Semi-N-body methods achieve 1% accuracy for quadrupole at small scales.
Approximate solvers, after calibration, are useful for covariance studies and large parameter scans.
Abstract
We present a comparison of major methodologies of fast generating mock halo or galaxy catalogues. The comparison is done for two-point and the three-point clustering statistics. The reference catalogues are drawn from the BigMultiDark N-body simulation. Both friend-of-friends (including distinct halos only) and spherical overdensity (including distinct halos and subhalos) catalogs have been used with the typical number density of a large-volume galaxy surveys. We demonstrate that a proper biasing model is essential for reproducing the power spectrum at quasilinear and even smaller scales. With respect to various clustering statistics a methodology based on perturbation theory and a realistic biasing model leads to very good agreement with N-body simulations. However, for the quadrupole of the correlation function or the power spectrum, only the method based on semi-N-body simulation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
