Can surface oxygen abundances of red giants be explained by the canonical mixing theory?
Yoichi Takeda, Bun'ei Sato, Masashi Omiya, and Hiroki Harakawa

TL;DR
This study investigates oxygen abundances in red giants to determine if observed deficiencies align with canonical mixing theory, finding minimal discrepancies that support current models.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive reanalysis of oxygen abundances in red giants, clarifying previous underestimations and confirming consistency with theoretical predictions.
Findings
Oxygen deficiency in red giants is marginal (<~0.1 dex).
Previous [O/H]_5577 results underestimated oxygen abundance.
Results support the adequacy of canonical mixing theory.
Abstract
Extensive oxygen abundance determinations were carried out for 239 late-G/early-K giant stars of 1.5-5 M_sun by applying the spectrum-fitting technique to O I 7771-5 and [O I] 6300/6363 lines based on the high-dispersion spectra in the red region newly obtained at Okayama Astrophysical Observatory. Our main purpose was to clarify whether any significantly large (<~0.4-0.5 dex) O-deficit really exists in these evolved stars, which was once suspected by Takeda et al. (2008, PASJ, 60, 781) from the analysis of the [O I] 5577 line, since it (if real) is inexlainable by the current theory and may require the necessity of special non-canonical deep mixing in the envelope. We found, however, that the previous [O/H]_5577 results (differential abundances relative to the sun) were systematically underestimated compared to the more reliable [O/H]_7773 (from O I 7771-5 triplet lines) or [O/H]_6300…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
