H.E.S.S. reveals a lack of TeV emission from the supernova remnant Puppis A
H.E.S.S. Collaboration: A. Abramowski, F. Aharonian, F. Ait Benkhali,, A.G. Akhperjanian, E.O. Ang\"uner, M. Backes, S. Balenderan, A. Balzer, A., Barnacka, Y. Becherini, J. Becker Tjus, D. Berge, S. Bernhard, K. Bernl\"ohr,, E. Birsin, J. Biteau, M. B\"ottcher, C. Boisson

TL;DR
This study uses H.E.S.S. observations to search for very-high-energy gamma-ray emission from Puppis A, finding no significant emission and suggesting a spectral cutoff or break in its gamma-ray spectrum.
Contribution
First VHE gamma-ray search for Puppis A with H.E.S.S., setting upper limits and constraining spectral features of its gamma-ray emission.
Findings
No significant VHE gamma-ray emission detected.
Upper limits imply a spectral cutoff below 450 GeV.
Spectral break may be due to particle acceleration cessation or environmental effects.
Abstract
Puppis A is an interesting ~4 kyr-old supernova remnant (SNR) that shows strong evidence of interaction between the forward shock and a molecular cloud. It has been studied in detail from radio frequencies to high-energy (HE, 0.1-100 GeV) gamma-rays. An analysis of the Fermi-LAT data has shown an extended HE gamma-ray emission with a 0.2-100 GeV spectrum exhibiting no significant deviation from a power law, unlike most of the GeV-emitting SNRs known to be interacting with molecular clouds. This makes it a promising target for imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes (IACTs) to probe the gamma-ray emission above 100 GeV. Very-high-energy (VHE, E >= 0.1 TeV) gamma-ray emission from Puppis A is for the first time searched for with the High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.). The analysis of the H.E.S.S. data does not reveal any significant emission towards Puppis A. The derived upper…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
