Relative Flux Calibration of the LAMOST Spectroscopic Survey of the Galactic Anti-center
Maosheng Xiang (1), Xiaowei Liu (1,2), Haibo Yuan (2), Zhiying Huo, (3), Yang Huang (1), Yong Zheng (1), Huawei Zhang (1), Bingqiu Chen (1),, Huihua Zhang (1), Ningchen Sun (1), Chun Wang (1), Yongheng Zhao (3),, Jianrong Shi (3), Ali Luo (3), Guoping Li (4), Zongrui Bai (3)

TL;DR
This paper presents an iterative flux calibration algorithm for the LAMOST spectroscopic survey, achieving about 10% accuracy in relative flux calibration across the 4000-9000 Å range, improving spectral data quality.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel iterative flux calibration method tailored for LAMOST spectra, accounting for individual spectrograph variations and enhancing calibration accuracy.
Findings
Achieved ~10% accuracy in relative flux calibration.
Flux response curves vary up to 30% for individual spectrographs.
Comparison with photometry shows small color offsets.
Abstract
We have developed and implemented an iterative algorithm of flux calibration for the LAMOST Spectroscopic Survey of the Galactic anti-center (LSS-GAC). For a given LSS-GAC plate, the spectra are first processed with a set of nominal spectral response curves (SRCs) and used to derive initial stellar atmospheric parameters (effective temperature , surface gravity log\, and metallicity [Fe/H]) as well as dust reddening of all targeted stars. For each of the sixteen spectrographs, several F-type stars of good signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) are then selected as flux standard stars for further, iterative spectral flux calibration. Comparison of spectrophotometric colours, deduced from the flux-calibrated spectra, with the photometric measurements yields average differences of 0.020.07 and 0.040.09\,mag for the and , respectively. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
