Progress towards a unified approach to entanglement distribution
Alexander Streltsov, Remigiusz Augusiak, Maciej Demianowicz, Maciej, Lewenstein

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether pre-shared correlations enhance entanglement distribution efficiency in noisy quantum channels, revealing that sending one part of a pure entangled state is generally optimal, and explores bounds involving quantum discord.
Contribution
It provides a unified theoretical framework for entanglement distribution strategies that are robust against noise, considering various measures and types of correlations.
Findings
Subadditive entanglement measures show no advantage from preshared correlations under certain noise models.
Sending one half of a pure entangled state is optimal for subadditive measures in noisy channels.
Quantum discord bounds reveal counter-intuitive advantages of weakly entangled states.
Abstract
Entanglement distribution is key to the success of secure communication schemes based on quantum mechanics, and there is a strong need for an ultimate architecture able to overcome the limitations of recent proposals such as those based on entanglement percolation or quantum repeaters. In this work we provide broad theoretical background for the development of such technologies. In particular, we investigate the question of whether entanglement distribution is more efficient if some amount of entanglement -- or some amount of correlations in general -- is available prior to the transmission stage of the protocol. We show that in the presence of noise the answer to this question strongly depends on the type of noise and on the way how entanglement is quantified. On the one hand, subadditive entanglement measures do not show advantage of preshared correlations if entanglement is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
