The first stars: CEMP--no stars and signatures of spinstars
Andre Maeder, Georges Meynet, Cristina Chiappini

TL;DR
This paper investigates the origins of peculiar chemical abundances in CEMP-no stars, suggesting that fast-rotating massive stars with partial mixing and stellar winds better explain observed patterns than traditional supernova or AGB models.
Contribution
It introduces a new classification scheme for CEMP-no stars based on their chemical signatures and highlights the role of rotating massive stars with partial mixing in their nucleosynthesis.
Findings
CEMP-no stars show products of He-burning with partial CNO processing.
Standard AGB and supernova models cannot fully explain observed abundances.
Stellar winds of fast-rotating massive stars better match the observed chemical patterns.
Abstract
(Abridged) The CEMP--no stars are "carbon-enhanced-metal-poor" stars that in principle show no evidence of s-- and r--elements from neutron captures. We try to understand the origin and nucleosynthetic site of their peculiar CNO, Ne--Na, and Mg--Al abundances. We compare the observed abundances to the nucleosynthetic predictions of AGB models and of models of rotating massive stars with internal mixing and mass loss. We also analyze the different behaviors of -- and CNO--elements, as well the abundances of elements involved in the Ne--Na and Mg--Al cycles. We show that CEMP-no stars exhibit products of He--burning that have gone through partial mixing and processing by the CNO cycle, producing low C/C and a broad variety of [C/N] and [O/N] ratios. From a C/C vs. [C/N] diagram, we conclude that neither the yields of AGB stars (in binaries or not) nor…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
