Boolean function monotonicity testing requires (almost) $n^{1/2}$ non-adaptive queries
Xi Chen, Anindya De, Rocco A. Servedio, Li-Yang Tan

TL;DR
This paper establishes a near-optimal lower bound on the number of non-adaptive queries needed to test Boolean function monotonicity, significantly advancing understanding of query complexity in property testing.
Contribution
It proves a nearly tight lower bound of (n^{1/2 - c}) for non-adaptive monotonicity testing, improving previous bounds and conjecturing optimality.
Findings
Lower bound of (n^{1/2 - c}) for all c>0.
Improves previous (n^{1/5}) lower bound.
Suggests (n^{1/2}) as the optimal bound.
Abstract
We prove a lower bound of , for all , on the query complexity of (two-sided error) non-adaptive algorithms for testing whether an -variable Boolean function is monotone versus constant-far from monotone. This improves a lower bound for the same problem that was recently given in [CST14] and is very close to , which we conjecture is the optimal lower bound for this model.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Algorithms and Data Compression
