Replicating the benefits of closed timelike curves without breaking causality
Xiao Yuan, Syed M. Assad, Jayne Thompson, Jing Yan Haw, Vlatko Vedral,, Timothy C. Ralph, Ping Koy Lam, Christian Weedbrook, Mile Gu

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that quantum entanglement can replicate the computational and cloning advantages of closed timelike curves without violating causality, revealing new insights into quantum-relativity interplay.
Contribution
It shows that entanglement enables key benefits of closed timelike curves while maintaining causality, challenging previous assumptions about their necessity for such advantages.
Findings
Efficiently solve NP-complete problems using entanglement without time travel.
Clone arbitrary quantum states without causal violations.
Benefits of closed timelike curves can be achieved without causality breaking.
Abstract
In general relativity, closed timelike curves can break causality with remarkable and unsettling consequences. At the classical level, they induce causal paradoxes disturbing enough to motivate conjectures that explicitly prevent their existence. At the quantum level, resolving such paradoxes induce radical benefits - from cloning unknown quantum states to solving problems intractable to quantum computers. Instinctively, one expects these benefits to vanish if causality is respected. Here we show that in harnessing entanglement, we can efficiently solve NP-complete problems and clone arbitrary quantum states - even when all time-travelling systems are completely isolated from the past. Thus, the many defining benefits of closed timelike curves can still be harnessed, even when causality is preserved. Our results unveil the subtle interplay between entanglement and general relativity,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
