Energy dynamics and current sheet structure in fluid and kinetic simulations of decaying magnetohydrodynamic turbulence
K. D. Makwana, V. Zhdankin, H. Li, W. Daughton, F. Cattaneo

TL;DR
This study compares fluid and kinetic simulations of decaying MHD turbulence, showing they produce similar large-scale energy decay and current sheet structures, while capturing different small-scale dissipation mechanisms.
Contribution
It demonstrates that kinetic simulations can replicate large-scale MHD turbulence dynamics and accurately model small-scale kinetic physics simultaneously.
Findings
Energy decay rates are similar in both codes.
Current sheet dimensions agree between models.
Kinetic dissipation is consistent with collisionless damping mechanisms.
Abstract
Simulations of decaying magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence are performed with a fluid and a kinetic code. The initial condition is an ensemble of long-wavelength, counter-propagating, shear-Alfv\'{e}n waves, which interact and rapidly generate strong MHD turbulence. The total energy is conserved and the rate of turbulent energy decay is very similar in both codes, although the fluid code has numerical dissipation whereas the kinetic code has kinetic dissipation. The inertial range power spectrum index is similar in both the codes. The fluid code shows a perpendicular wavenumber spectral slope of . The kinetic code shows a spectral slope of for smaller simulation domain, and for larger domain. We estimate that collisionless damping mechanisms in the kinetic code can account for the dissipation of the observed nonlinear energy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
