Performance study of the effective gain of the double phase liquid Argon LEM Time Projection Chamber
C.Cantini (1), L.Epprecht (1), A.Gendotti (1), S.Horikawa (1),, L.Periale (1), S.Murphy (1), G.Natterer (1), C.Regenfus (1), F.Resnati (1),, F.Sergiampietri (1, 2), A.Rubbia (1), T.Viant (1), S.Wu (1) ((1) ETH, Zurich, Institute for Particle Physics, CH-8093 Z\"urich

TL;DR
This study evaluates the performance of different LEM designs in a double phase liquid argon TPC, demonstrating high gains, charge uniformity, and stability, supporting future large-scale detector applications.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of how LEM design parameters affect gain and stability, advancing the understanding of LEM optimization in liquid argon TPCs.
Findings
Maximal gain of around 150 achieved.
Charge surfaces charge up with different time constants.
LAr LEM TPC is robust and suitable for large detectors.
Abstract
The Large Electron Multipliers (LEMs) are key components of double phase liquid argon TPCs. The drifting charges after being extracted from the liquid are amplified in the LEM positioned half a centimeter above the liquid in pure argon vapor at 87 K. The LEM is characterised by the size of its dielectric rim around the holes, the thickness of the LEM insulator, the diameter of the holes as well as their geometrical layout. The impact of those design parameters on the amplification were checked by testing seven different LEMs with an active area of 1010 cm in a double phase liquid argon TPC of 21 cm drift. We studied their response in terms of maximal reachable gain and impact on the collected charge uniformity as well as the long term stability of the gain. We show that we could reach maximal gains of around 150 which corresponds to a signal-to-noise ratio () of about…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
