Physical properties of z>4 submillimeter galaxies in the COSMOS field
V. Smolcic, A. Karim, O. Miettinen, M. Novak, B. Magnelli, D. A., Riechers, E. Schinnerer, P. Capak, M. Bondi, P. Ciliegi, M. Aravena, F., Bertoldi, S. Bourke, J. Banfield, C. L. Carilli, F. Civano, O. Ilbert, H. T., Intema, O. Le Fevre, A. Finoguenov, G. Hallinan

TL;DR
This study investigates the physical properties of six z>4 submillimeter galaxies in the COSMOS field, revealing their sizes, masses, and IR characteristics, and comparing them to lower-redshift counterparts to understand galaxy evolution.
Contribution
First detailed size and IR property measurements of z>4 SMGs using new radio data, highlighting their similarities and differences with lower-redshift SMGs and local galaxies.
Findings
Median star-forming region size ~4.1x2.3 kpc^2
Average stellar mass ~1.4x10^11 M_sun
IR luminosity up to ten times higher than lower-redshift SMGs
Abstract
We study the physical properties of a sample of 6 SMGs in the COSMOS field, spectroscopically confirmed to lie at z>4. We use new GMRT 325 MHz and 3 GHz JVLA data to probe the rest-frame 1.4 GHz emission at z=4, and to estimate the sizes of the star-forming (SF) regions of these sources, resp. Combining our size estimates with those available in the literature for AzTEC1 and AzTEC3 we infer a median radio-emitting size for our z>4 SMGs of (0.63"+/-0.12")x(0.35"+/-0.05") or 4.1x2.3 kpc^2 (major times minor axis; assuming z=4.5) or lower if we take the two marginally resolved SMGs as unresolved. This is consistent with the sizes of SF regions in lower-redshift SMGs, and local normal galaxies, yet higher than the sizes of SF regions of local ULIRGs. Our SMG sample consists of a fair mix of compact and more clumpy systems with multiple, perhaps merging, components. With an average formation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
