A counterexample to the pseudo 2-factor isomorphic graph conjecture
Jan Goedgebeur

TL;DR
This paper disproves a conjecture about pseudo 2-factor isomorphic cubic bipartite graphs by providing a counterexample with 30 vertices and shows this is the only such counterexample up to 40 vertices.
Contribution
The authors construct the first known counterexample to the conjecture and verify the uniqueness of such counterexamples up to 40 vertices.
Findings
Counterexample with 30 vertices disproves the conjecture.
This is the only counterexample up to at least 40 vertices.
The conjecture about 2-factor hamiltonian cubic bipartite graphs holds up to 40 vertices.
Abstract
A graph is pseudo 2-factor isomorphic if the parity of the number of cycles in a 2-factor is the same for all 2-factors of . Abreu et al. conjectured that , the Heawood graph and the Pappus graph are the only essentially 4-edge-connected pseudo 2-factor isomorphic cubic bipartite graphs (Abreu et al., Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 2008, Conjecture 3.6). Using a computer search we show that this conjecture is false by constructing a counterexample with 30 vertices. We also show that this is the only counterexample up to at least 40 vertices. A graph is 2-factor hamiltonian if all 2-factors of are hamiltonian cycles. Funk et al. conjectured that every 2-factor hamiltonian cubic bipartite graph can be obtained from and the Heawood graph by applying repeated star products (Funk et al., Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 2003,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
