Reassessing the discovery potential of the $B \to K^{*} \ell^+\ell^-$ decays in the large-recoil region: SM challenges and BSM opportunities
Sebastian J\"ager, Jorge Martin Camalich

TL;DR
This paper critically analyzes the potential of $B o K^* \, \ell^+\ell^-$ decays in the large-recoil region to distinguish Standard Model physics from New Physics, focusing on anomalies, right-handed currents, and lepton universality violations, with implications for future measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a model-independent parameterization of hadronic matrix elements and assesses the robustness of angular observables against QCD effects, proposing new observables for NP detection.
Findings
Angular observables are sensitive to long-distance QCD effects.
A fit suggests a possible NP contribution with $\,\delta C_9 \simeq -1.5$, but with limited statistical significance.
Certain observables like $P_1$ and $P_3^{CP}$ are highly sensitive to right-handed currents at low $q^2$.
Abstract
We critically examine the potential to disentangle Standard Model (SM) and New Physics (NP) in and decays, focusing on the LHCb anomaly, the search for right-handed currents, and lepton-universality violation. Restricting ourselves to the large-recoil region, we advocate a parameterisation of the hadronic matrix elements that separates model-independent information about nonperturbative QCD from the results of model calculations. We clarify how to estimate corrections to the heavy-quark limit that would generate a right-handed (virtual) photon in the contribution to the decay. We then apply this approach to the discussion of various sets of observables of increasing theoretical cleanness. First, we show that angular observables in the optimized basis are, in general, not robust against the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
