Rule reasoning for legal norm validation of FSTP facts
Naouel Karam, Shashishekar Ramakrishna, Adrian Paschke
TL;DR
This paper proposes a rule reasoning methodology for validating legal norms of FSTP facts to ensure patentability requirements like non-obviousness are met.
Contribution
It introduces a novel rule reasoning approach specifically designed for legal norm validation of FSTP facts in patent law.
Findings
The methodology effectively validates legal norms for patentability.
It enhances the accuracy of non-obviousness assessments.
The approach offers a systematic framework for legal norm validation.
Abstract
Non-obviousness or inventive step is a general requirement for patentability in most patent law systems. An invention should be at an adequate distance beyond its prior art in order to be patented. This short paper provides an overview on a methodology proposed for legal norm validation of FSTP facts using rule reasoning approach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, logistics, and international trade · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Artificial Intelligence in Law