Unicity of types for supercuspidal representations of p-adic SL(2)
Peter Latham

TL;DR
This paper investigates the uniqueness of types for supercuspidal representations of p-adic SL(2), introducing archetypes and establishing their relation to GL(2) types, with implications for the inertial Langlands correspondence.
Contribution
It introduces the notion of archetypes for SL(2) supercuspidal representations and shows they are induced from Bushnell--Kutzko types, linking archetypes between SL(2) and GL(2).
Findings
Any archetype in SL(2) is restricted from one in GL(2).
The number of archetypes for a supercuspidal representation is explicitly described in terms of ramification.
A relationship between archetypes for GL(2) and SL(2) is established via L-packets, leading to an inertial Langlands correspondence.
Abstract
We consider the question of unicity of types on maximal compact subgroups for supercuspidal representations of over a nonarchimedean local field of odd residual characteristic. We introduce the notion of an archetype as the -conjugacy class of a typical representation of a maximal compact subgroup, and go on to show that any archetype in is restricted from one in . From this it follows that any archetype must be induced from a Bushnell--Kutzko type. Given a supercuspidal representation , we give an additional explicit description of the number of archetypes admitted by in terms of its ramification. We also describe a relationship between archetypes for and in terms of -packets, and deduce an inertial Langlands correspondence for .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
