Von Neumann Was Not a Quantum Bayesian
Blake C. Stacey

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the claim that John von Neumann was the first quantum Bayesian, arguing that historically this assertion is unsupported and clarifying misconceptions about von Neumann's role in QBism.
Contribution
It provides a historical analysis showing that von Neumann was not a quantum Bayesian, challenging the common misconception and clarifying the origins of QBism.
Findings
Von Neumann was not a quantum Bayesian.
The claim that von Neumann inaugurated QBism is historically unsupported.
Clarifies the distinction between von Neumann's work and QBism.
Abstract
Wikipedia has claimed for over three years now that John von Neumann was the "first quantum Bayesian." In context, this reads as stating that von Neumann inaugurated QBism, the approach to quantum theory promoted by Fuchs, Mermin and Schack. This essay explores how such a claim is, historically speaking, unsupported.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
