On the Occurrence Rate of Hot Jupiters in Different Stellar Environments
Ji Wang, Debra A. Fischer, Elliott P. Horch, Xu Huang

TL;DR
This paper investigates the discrepancies in Hot Jupiter occurrence rates between Doppler and Kepler surveys, identifying sources of error and discussing how to accurately measure their true occurrence rates across different stellar environments.
Contribution
It analyzes causes of differing HJ occurrence rates, including misidentification and sample differences, and proposes methods to synthesize results for fundamental occurrence rate estimates.
Findings
12.8% of HJs are misidentified in Kepler data
HJs are less frequent in subgiants and multiple systems
Current data limits precise fundamental rate measurements
Abstract
Many Hot Jupiters (HJs) are detected by the Doppler and the transit techniques. From surveys using these two techniques, however, the measured HJ occurrence rates differ by a factor of two or more. Using the California Planet Survey sample and the Kepler sample, we investigate the causes for the difference of HJ occurrence rate. First, we find that of HJs are misidentified in the Kepler mission because of photometric dilution and subgiant contamination. Second, we explore the differences between the Doppler sample and the Kepler sample that can account for the different HJ occurrence rate. Third, we discuss how to measure the fundamental HJ occurrence rates by synthesizing the results from the Doppler and Kepler surveys. The fundamental HJ occurrence rates are a measure of HJ occurrence rate as a function of stellar multiplicity and evolutionary stage, e.g., the HJ…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
