Communication complexity and the reality of the wave-function

TL;DR

This paper explores the connection between quantum communication complexity and the foundational debate on the nature of the quantum state, proposing a new theorem linking classical simulation costs to quantum interpretations.

Contribution

It introduces a novel argument relating classical communication costs in quantum simulations to the PBR theorem, using a weaker assumption called probability equipartition property.

Findings

Classical simulation of n-qubit communication grows more than exponentially with n.

The probability equipartition property supports the PBR theorem in a broader context.

A new theorem connecting quantum foundations and communication complexity is developed.

Abstract

In this review, we discuss a relation between quantum communication complexity and a long-standing debate in quantum foundation concerning the interpretation of the quantum state. Is the quantum state a physical element of reality as originally interpreted by Schrodinger? Or is it an abstract mathematical object containing statistical information about the outcome of measurements as interpreted by Born? Although these questions sound philosophical and pointless, they can be made precise in the framework of what we call classical theories of quantum processes, which are a reword of quantum phenomena in the language of classical probability theory. In 2012, Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph (PBR) proved, under an assumption of preparation independence, a theorem supporting the original interpretation of Schrodinger in the classical framework. Recently, we showed that these questions are related to a practical problem in quantum communication complexity, namely, quantifying the minimal amount of classical communication required in the classical simulation of a two-party quantum communication process. In particular, we argued that the statement of the PBR theorem can be proved if the classical communication cost of simulating the communication of n qubits grows more than exponentially in 'n'. Our argument is based on an assumption that we call probability equipartition property. This property is somehow weaker than the preparation independence property used in the PBR theorem, as the former can be justified by the latter and the asymptotic equipartition property of independent stochastic sources. The equipartition property is a general and natural hypothesis that can be assumed even if the preparation independence hypothesis is dropped. In this review, we further develop our argument into the form of a theorem.