Symmetric Weighted First-Order Model Counting
Paul Beame, Guy Van den Broeck, Eric Gribkoff, Dan Suciu

TL;DR
This paper investigates the complexity of symmetric weighted first-order model counting, revealing computational hardness results and identifying tractable cases, with implications for probabilistic inference in knowledge bases.
Contribution
It characterizes the complexity of symmetric WFOMC for various fragments and query types, providing new hardness results and identifying polynomial-time cases.
Findings
FOMC is #P1-complete for some FO^3 formulas.
WFOMC is #P1-complete for some conjunctive queries.
All γ-acyclic queries have polynomial data complexity.
Abstract
The FO Model Counting problem (FOMC) is the following: given a sentence in FO and a number , compute the number of models of over a domain of size ; the Weighted variant (WFOMC) generalizes the problem by associating a weight to each tuple and defining the weight of a model to be the product of weights of its tuples. In this paper we study the complexity of the symmetric WFOMC, where all tuples of a given relation have the same weight. Our motivation comes from an important application, inference in Knowledge Bases with soft constraints, like Markov Logic Networks, but the problem is also of independent theoretical interest. We study both the data complexity, and the combined complexity of FOMC and WFOMC. For the data complexity we prove the existence of an FO formula for which FOMC is #P-complete, and the existence of a Conjunctive Query for which WFOMC is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Advanced Graph Neural Networks
