Compensating for the loss of a chance
Rafael B. Stern, Joseph B. Kadane

TL;DR
This paper explores the legal and conceptual framework for valuing damages in lost chance cases, proposing six guiding questions and formulas applicable to various outcomes, including medical misdiagnosis.
Contribution
It introduces an abstract model with six questions for valuing lost chances, unifying existing formulas and discussing legal restrictions.
Findings
Proposes six conceptual questions for valuation
Derives formulas applicable to medical misdiagnosis cases
Unifies various existing valuation formulas
Abstract
Civil liability for a lost chance applies to legal cases in which a tortious action changes the probabilities of the outcomes that can be obtained by the victim. A central point in the application of this type of liability is the valuation of damages. Despite the practical importance of the valuation of lost chances, the legal restrictions that guide it have rarely been discussed explicitly. In order to discuss these restrictions, we propose an abstract description of a lost chance case in which there are multiple possible outcomes and the victim can make a choice that affects these outcomes. Given this description, we propose six conceptual questions to guide the valuation of lost chances. We discuss alternative answers to these questions and present the formulas that derive from them. More specifically, we show that the main formulas that have been proposed for medical misdiagnosis…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMedical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
