Molecular gas and nuclear activity in early-type galaxies: any link with radio-loudness?
Ranieri D. Baldi (1,2,3), Marcello Giroletti (4), Alessandro Capetti, (5), Gabriele Giovannini (4,6), Viviana Casasola (4), Miguel A. Perez-Torres, (7), Nario Kuno (8) ((1) SISSA, Trieste, (2) Technion, Haifa, (3) University, of Haifa, (4) INAF-Istituto di Radio Astronomia

TL;DR
This study investigates the molecular gas content in nearby early-type galaxies hosting low-luminosity AGN, finding no significant difference between radio-loud and radio-quiet types, suggesting molecular gas does not determine radio-loudness.
Contribution
First comprehensive analysis comparing molecular gas in RL and RQ AGN-hosting early-type galaxies, showing no significant difference in molecular gas content.
Findings
55% CO detection rate in the sample
No significant difference in molecular gas between RL and RQ AGN
Weak trend between H2 mass and nuclear activity indicators
Abstract
Aims. We want to study the amount of molecular gas in a sample of nearby early-type galaxies (ETGs) which host low-luminosity Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). We look for possible differences between the radio-loud (RL) and radio-quiet (RQ) AGN. Methods. We observed the CO(1-0) and CO(2-1) spectral lines with the IRAM 30m and NRO 45m telescopes for eight galaxies. They belong to a large sample of 37 local ETGs which host both RQ and RL AGN. We gather data from the literature for the entire sample. Results. We report the new detection of CO(1-0) emission in four galaxies (UGC0968, UGC5617, UGC6946, and UGC8355) and CO(2-1) emission in two of them (UGC0968 and UGC5617). The CO(2-1)/CO(1-0) ratio in these sources is . Considering both the new observations and the literature, the detection rate of CO in our sample is 55 9%, with no statistically significant difference…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
