Crucial role of non-specific interactions in amyloid nucleation
An{\dj}ela \v{S}ari\'c, Yassmine C. Chebaro, Tuomas P. J. Knowles and, Daan Frenkel

TL;DR
This study uses computer simulations to show that non-specific interactions between peptides are crucial for amyloid fibril formation at physiological concentrations, supporting a two-step nucleation process involving oligomers rather than classical one-step nucleation.
Contribution
It demonstrates that non-specific attractions are essential for amyloid nucleation at physiological levels, revealing a two-step mechanism involving oligomers, contrasting classical nucleation theory.
Findings
Oligomers facilitate peptide meeting and conversion to fibril-forming structures.
Nucleation occurs via rare oligomer fluctuations, not the most common oligomers.
Critical nucleus size increases with concentration and interactions, opposing classical theory.
Abstract
Protein oligomers have been implicated as toxic agents in a wide range of amyloid-related diseases. Yet it has remained unsolved whether the oligomers are a necessary step in the formation of amyloid fibrils, or just a dangerous by-product. Analogously, it has not been resolved if the amyloid nucleation process is a classical one-step nucleation process, or a two-step process involving pre-nucleation clusters. We use coarse-grained computer simulations to study the effect of non-specific attractions between peptides on the primary nucleation process underlying amyloid fibrillization. We find that for peptides that do not attract, the classical one-step nucleation mechanism is possible, but only at non-physiologically high peptide concentrations. At low peptide concentrations, which mimic the physiologically relevant regime, attractive inter-peptide interactions are essential for fibril…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
