The physical nature of the cosmic accretion of baryons and dark matter into halos and their galaxies
Andrew R. Wetzel, Daisuke Nagai

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological simulations to distinguish between physical and pseudo-evolution of halo growth, revealing that baryonic accretion remains physically meaningful at z > 1 and is decoupled from dark matter growth at lower redshifts.
Contribution
It demonstrates that baryonic accretion continues to be physically significant at low redshifts, unlike dark matter, and clarifies the different behaviors of dark matter and gas in halo growth.
Findings
Dark matter growth is largely pseudo-evolution at z < 1.
Gas accretion remains physically meaningful and tracks halo accretion rates.
Decoupling of gas and dark matter occurs around 2 R_200m.
Abstract
The cosmic accretion of both dark matter and baryons into halos typically is measured using some evolving virial relation, but recent work suggests that most halo growth at late cosmic time (z < 2) is not physical but is rather the by-product of an evolving virial radius ("pseudo-evolution"). Using Omega25, a suite of cosmological simulations that incorporate both dark matter and gas dynamics with differing treatments of gas cooling, star formation, and thermal feedback, we systematically explore the physics that governs cosmic accretion into halos and their galaxies. Physically meaningful cosmic accretion of both dark matter and baryons occurs at z > 1 across our halo mass range: M_200m = 10^{11-14} M_sun. However, dark matter, because it is dissipationless, is deposited (in a time-average sense) at > R_200m(z) in a shell-like manner, such that dark-matter mass and density experience…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
