Constraining the galaxy mass content in the core of A383 using velocity dispersion measurements for individual cluster members
A. Monna, S. Seitz, A. Zitrin, M. J. Geller, C. Grillo, A. Mercurio,, N. Greisel, A. Halkola, S. H. Suyu, M. Postman, P. Rosati, I. Balestra, A., Biviano, D. Coe, D. G. Fabricant, H. S. Hwang, A. Koekemoer

TL;DR
This study uses velocity dispersion measurements of individual galaxies in Abell 383 to improve the separation of galaxy and dark halo mass contributions, refining lens models and galaxy mass estimates.
Contribution
It introduces the use of galaxy velocity dispersions to break degeneracies in lensing models, enhancing the accuracy of galaxy and dark matter halo mass constraints.
Findings
Improved fit by 17-20% using velocity dispersions.
Refined galaxy mass-to-light scaling relation by ~50%.
Estimated galaxy truncation radii and stripped masses consistent with simulations.
Abstract
We use velocity dispersion measurements of 21 individual cluster members in the core of Abell 383, obtained with MMT Hectospec, to separate the galaxy and the smooth dark halo (DH) lensing contributions. While lensing usually constrains the overall, projected mass density, the innovative use of velocity dispersion measurements as a proxy for masses of individual cluster members breaks inherent degeneracies and allows us to (a) refine the constraints on single galaxy masses and on the galaxy mass-to-light scaling relation and, as a result, (b) refine the constraints on the DM-only map, a high-end goal of lens modelling. The knowledge of cluster member velocity dispersions improves the fit by 17% in terms of the image reproduction , or 20% in terms of the rms. The constraints on the mass parameters improve by ~10% for the DH, while for the galaxy component, they are refined…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
