Family of Bell-like inequalities as device-independent witnesses for entanglement depth
Yeong-Cherng Liang, Denis Rosset, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Gilles P\"utz,, Tomer Jack Barnea, Nicolas Gisin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a family of Bell inequalities that serve as device-independent witnesses for entanglement depth, enabling certification of genuine k-partite entanglement in multi-party quantum systems without assumptions on measurements or system dimension.
Contribution
The authors present a new family of Bell inequalities that are complete, facet-defining, and naturally quantify entanglement depth in many-body quantum systems.
Findings
Bell inequalities are applicable to arbitrarily many parties with binary measurements.
Quantum violations of these inequalities indicate the extent of genuine many-body entanglement.
The inequalities serve as device-independent witnesses for entanglement depth.
Abstract
We present a simple family of Bell inequalities applicable to a scenario involving arbitrarily many parties, each of which performs two binary-outcome measurements. We show that these inequalities are members of the complete set of full-correlation Bell inequalities discovered by Werner-Wolf-Zukowski-Brukner. For scenarios involving a small number of parties, we further verify that these inequalities are facet-defining for the convex set of Bell-local correlations. Moreover, we show that the amount of quantum violation of these inequalities naturally manifests the extent to which the underlying system is genuinely many-body entangled. In other words, our Bell inequalities, when supplemented with the appropriate quantum bounds, naturally serve as device-independent witnesses for entanglement depth, allowing one to certify genuine k-partite entanglement in an arbitrary -partite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
