A stubbornly large mass of cold dust in the ejecta of Supernova 1987A
M. Matsuura (1), E. Dwek (2), M. J. Barlow (1), B. Babler (3), M. Baes, (4), M. Meixner (5), Jose Cernicharo (6), Geoff C. Clayton (7), L. Dunne (8,, 9), C. Fransson (10), Jacopo Fritz (4), Walter Gear (11), H. L. Gomez (11),, M.A.T. Groenewegen (12), R. Indebetouw (13,14)

TL;DR
This study uses Herschel observations to confirm a large mass of cold dust in Supernova 1987A's ejecta, indicating supernovae significantly contribute to cosmic dust budgets.
Contribution
It provides new far-infrared data and refined dust mass estimates, supporting the presence of over half a solar mass of dust, larger than previous predictions.
Findings
Detected approximately 0.8 solar masses of dust in the ejecta.
Confirmed the dominance of cold dust with a temperature near a single value.
Supported supernovae as major dust sources in galaxies.
Abstract
We present new Herschel photometric and spectroscopic observations of Supernova 1987A, carried out in 2012. Our dedicated photometric measurements provide new 70 micron data and improved imaging quality at 100 and 160 micron compared to previous observations in 2010. Our Herschel spectra show only weak CO line emission, and provide an upper limit for the 63 micron [O I] line flux, eliminating the possibility that line contaminations distort the previously estimated dust mass. The far-infrared spectral energy distribution (SED) is well fitted by thermal emission from cold dust. The newly measured 70 micron flux constrains the dust temperature, limiting it to nearly a single temperature. The far-infrared emission can be fitted by 0.5+-0.1 Msun of amorphous carbon, about a factor of two larger than the current nucleosynthetic mass prediction for carbon. The observation of SiO molecules at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
