New Constraints on Quantum Gravity from X-ray and Gamma-Ray Observations
Eric S. Perlman (FIT), Saul A. Rappaport (MIT), Wayne A. Christensen, (North Carolina), Y. Jack Ng (North Carolina), John DeVore (Visidyne), David, Pooley (Sam Houston St.)

TL;DR
This paper uses X-ray and gamma-ray observations to place new constraints on models of quantum spacetime foam, ruling out certain theoretical models based on observational limits on path-length fluctuations.
Contribution
It reassesses previous astronomical tests of spacetime foam models and provides tighter constraints on the accumulation power parameter $oldsymbol{\alpha}$ using multi-energy observations.
Findings
Chandra X-ray data constrains $oldsymbol{\alpha extgreater 0.58}$
Fermi gamma-ray data constrains $oldsymbol{\alpha extgreater 0.67}$
Cherenkov telescope data constrains $oldsymbol{\alpha extgreater 0.72}$
Abstract
One aspect of the quantum nature of spacetime is its "foaminess" at very small scales. Many models for spacetime foam are defined by the accumulation power , which parameterizes the rate at which Planck-scale spatial uncertainties (and thephase shifts they produce) may accumulate over large path-lengths. Here is defined by theexpression for the path-length fluctuations, , of a source at distance , wherein , with being the Planck length. We reassess previous proposals to use astronomical observations ofdistant quasars and AGN to test models of spacetime foam. We show explicitly how wavefront distortions on small scales cause the image intensity to decay to the point where distant objects become undetectable when the path-length fluctuations become comparable to the wavelength of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
