Cathoristic logic: A modal logic of incompatible propositions
Richard Prideaux Evans, Martin Berger

TL;DR
Cathoristic logic introduces a novel modal logic framework that replaces negation with an operator for expressing incompatibility, providing a new tool for knowledge representation with efficient decision procedures.
Contribution
The paper presents the syntax, semantics, proof rules, and key properties of cathoristic logic, a new logic for incompatible propositions, including decision procedures and semantic characterizations.
Findings
Complete proof rules established
Decidable in quadratic time
Supports semantic characterization of elementary equivalence
Abstract
Cathoristic logic is a multi-modal logic where negation is replaced by a novel operator allowing the expression of incompatible sentences. We present the syntax and semantics of the logic including complete proof rules, and establish a number of results such as compactness, a semantic characterisation of elementary equivalence, the existence of a quadratic-time decision procedure, and Brandom's incompatibility semantics property. We demonstrate the usefulness of the logic as a language for knowledge representation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
