
TL;DR
This paper models the strategic interactions among Bitcoin mining pools, revealing that pools face a dilemma between attacking each other to gain more rewards or cooperating to maintain profitability, with implications for system security.
Contribution
It introduces a game-theoretic model of pool attacks, showing the existence of a miner's dilemma and analyzing equilibrium behaviors in open mining pools.
Findings
No-pool-attacks is not a Nash equilibrium.
Pools tend to attack each other in equilibrium, leading to a tragedy of the commons.
Active Bitcoin pools currently avoid attacking, maintaining system stability.
Abstract
An open distributed system can be secured by requiring participants to present proof of work and rewarding them for participation. The Bitcoin digital currency introduced this mechanism, which is adopted by almost all contemporary digital currencies and related services. A natural process leads participants of such systems to form pools, where members aggregate their power and share the rewards. Experience with Bitcoin shows that the largest pools are often open, allowing anyone to join. It has long been known that a member can sabotage an open pool by seemingly joining it but never sharing its proofs of work. The pool shares its revenue with the attacker, and so each of its participants earns less. We define and analyze a game where pools use some of their participants to infiltrate other pools and perform such an attack. With any number of pools, no-pool-attacks is not a Nash…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlockchain Technology Applications and Security · Game Theory and Applications · Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
