Hemispheric Coupling: Comparing Dynamo Simulations and Observations
Aimee A. Norton, Paul Charbonneau, Dario Passos

TL;DR
This study compares long-term solar magnetic cycle simulations with observations, focusing on hemispheric asymmetry and phase lag, revealing similarities and differences that inform understanding of magnetic coupling mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison between 1600-year simulated and observed hemispheric cycle asymmetries, highlighting model limitations and constraints on magnetic coupling processes.
Findings
Simulated hemispheric phase lags do not exceed 20% of cycle period.
Simulations show persistent hemispheric leading for several cycles.
Model amplitude variations are larger than observed in the Sun.
Abstract
Numerical simulations that reproduce solar-like magnetic cycles can be used to generate long-term statistics. The variations in N-S hemispheric cycle synchronicity and amplitude produced in simulations has not been widely compared to observations. The observed limits on asymmetry show that hemispheric sunspot area production is no more than 20% asymmetric for cycles 12-23 and phase lags do not exceed 20% (2 yrs) of the total cycle period. Independent studies have found a long-term trend in phase values as one hemisphere leads the other for ~four cycles. Such persistence in phase is not indicative of a stochastic phenomenon. We compare the findings to results from a numerical simulation of solar convection recently produced with the EULAG-MHD model. This simulation spans 1600 yrs and generated 40 regular, sunspot-like cycles. While the simulated cycle length is too long and the toroidal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
